Ms. Kathleen M. Morozowich
James D. Griffin, Esquire
January 23, 1995
Page 2

On January 11, 1995 the District responded to the complaint. The District asserted under the Act that the instant complaint involves an interpretation of 29 Del. C. § 10002(e) defining a meeting. The District stated that the breakfast meeting has occurred for a number of years and the purpose of this meeting "[i]s to allow the Board, the administrative staff and selected invitees from among the secretarial, instructional and custodial staffs to meet in an informal atmosphere." (Response at 1). The District stated that discussion at the meeting is "primarily led by the Superintendent who provides the introduction of the invitees allowing each of them to present some brief biographical information, explaining their backgrounds, their present jobs and offering suggestions for betterment of the school system." (Response at 1,2). The District asserted that it believes does not conduct public business and does not hold any form of Executive Sessions. Finally, the District states that based on the above description of the activities at the breakfast, it believed that the meeting does not meet the definition of a public "meeting" in § 10002(e).

A review of the Board's December 6, 1994 notice indicate that the same is written on Woodbridge School District stationary and is from Mr. Dan Kingery, Assistant Superintendent in re: "Monthly District Breakfast". It stated as follows:

According to the memorandum, the Board of Education, Robert C. Sutton Superintendent and Administrative Staff received copies.

THE LAW

Next Page Next Page